Red Flag – 9/11 Commission Ignores Pakistan’s Money Connection
December 2, 2010 By
Despite the 9-11 Commission’s mandate to provide a “full and complete accounting” of the attacks of September 11, many key points were omitted from the final report. One of these important omissions attempted to cover up the role of Pakistan and whether or not Pakistani intelligence helped to fund the 9-11 attacks.
Ties between Washington DC and the Pakistani intelligence agency, the ISI have been documented in media reports before and after the September 11th attacks. In March 2001, Pakistani regional expert and member of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Selig Harrisson, said “the CIA still has close links with the Pakistani intelligence service ISI.” Just one day before the attacks, a Pakistani newspaper in Islamabad reported that the head of the ISI was meeting with unspecified members of the Pentagon, National Security Council, and CIA Director George Tenet.
On May 18th, 2002 the Washington Post reported that:
“On the morning of Sept. 11, Porter Goss and Bob Graham were having breakfast with a Pakistani general named Mahmud Ahmed — the soon-to-be-sacked head of Pakistan’s intelligence service. Ahmed ran a spy agency notoriously close to Osama bin Laden and the Taliban.”
Specific details of that meeting have still not been released and may never have been recorded.
In 2001, various media outlets (CNN, Fox News, ABC, and AP) reported that $100,000 was wired from Pakistan to Mohammed Atta, the 9-11 lead hijacker. A “senior law enforcement source” told CNN that the paymaster was believed to be Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, who was working for the Pakistani ISI at the time.
Several media outlets reported in 2002 that the US government believed Saeed Sheikh to be an asset of the ISI, and that senior ISI officers knew him well. Also reported was the allegation by Indian intelligence that General Mahmud Ahmed ordered the wire transfer and that Indian intelligence claimed they had assisted the FBI during the investigation. Various mainstream Indian papers reported this in 2001 along with a mainstream Pakistani newspaper. In the West – the Wall Street Journal and Agence France Press picked up on the story in October.
On October 7th 2001, Mahmud Ahmed was fired from his role at the ISI. The official explanation was because he was too close to the Taliban. This claim has been met with criticism by some analysts given the fact that there were several pro-Taliban officers that kept their jobs.
During the 9/11 Commission hearings, the Family Steering Committee asked the Commissioners to investigate the ISI connection. However, the commission did little to “follow the money” and the 9/11 Commission Report made no mention of these allegations. Furthermore, the commission made the absurd statement that the question of who financed the terrorist attacks was “of little practical significance” [and that it had] “seen no evidence that any foreign government–or foreign government official–supplied any funding.”
To listen to this 9-11 Red Flag, click Play in the embedded player below. Click download if you would like to download the file for your media player or iPod.
Red Flag – The Bush administration opposed a 9/11 Commission
November 13, 2010 By
The Bush administration fought hard against the creation of an independent commission to investigate September 11th. The families who fought for the creation of such a commission, wanted full accountability concerning the event that led to the deaths of their loved ones. Yet, the Bush administration resisted this. Why?
On the January 29th, 2002 – CNN reported,
“President Bush personally asked Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle Tuesday to limit the congressional investigation into the events of September 11”.
Daschle told reporters that an investigation,
“…would take resources and personnel away from the effort in the war on terrorism”.
On May 23rd 2002, CBS reported that,
“President Bush took a few minutes during his trip to Europe Thursday to voice his opposition to establishing a special commission to probe how the government dealt with terror warnings before Sept. 11.”
The excuses for the opposition to the Commission often given were alleged fears of national security compromises and claims that those involved in the “war on terrorism” would have their jobs hampered. Yet, clearly national security had already been compromised as a result of the attacks. If there were such failings and if people did not do their jobs, then they needed to be held accountable.
In September 2002, under pressure from victims’ family members, CBS reported,
“President Bush told Congress he now supports creation of an independent commission to probe the September eleventh attacks.”
The victims’ families “fought the Bush administration tooth and nail for a commission to investigate the September 11th terrorist attacks — and won”. Yet, why did they even have to fight them for an investigation in the first place?
In total, the Bush administration fought off an investigation for 441 days before the mandate was finally passed into law on November 27, 2002.
During the 9/11 Commission hearings – the Family Steering Committee requested Commissioners to ask Bush and Cheney to,
“explain your 14 month opposition to the creation of an independent commission to investigate 9/11 and your request to Senator Daschle to quash such an investigation”.
Yet, no answer is forthcoming.
The Bush administration actively opposed any formal investigation into the attacks of September 11th. If it were not for the determination of victims’ family members and a budding 9-11 Truth Movement, there would have never been any inquiry beyond the heavily redacted Joint Intelligence Committee Inquiry from 2002. Why did President Bush not want the American public to know exactly what happened before, during, and after the September 11th attacks?
To listen to this 9-11 Red Flag, click Play in the embedded player below. Click download if you would like to download the file for your media player or iPod.
Visibility 9-11 Welcomes back to the Program Dr. Steven E. Jones
April 3, 2009 By
This important episode of Visibility 9-11 welcomes back to the program Physicist Dr. Steven E. Jones. Dr. Jones is a retired physics professor and first emerged in late 2005 with his important paper, Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center Buildings Completely Collapse?, and has continued to do groundbreaking research into the “collapses” of all three high rise buildings on September 11th, 2001.
Our talk today with Dr. Jones features an in-depth discussion on a new paper which has been formally published and peer reviewed by The Open Chemical Physics Journal titled Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe. In this revolutionary new research paper, discoveries made in the World Trade Center dust, particularly the red/gray bi-layered chips, are examined in great detail and include evidence of the thermite fingerprint at every juncture.
The research paper ends with this sentence, which pulls no punches when it comes to what the authors believe these red/gray chips to be:
“Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.”
Kevin Ryan says,
“My colleagues and I have a new mainstream peer-reviewed paper published today, entitled “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust From the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe”. Basically it shows that high tech explosive/pyrotechnic materials are scattered throughout the WTC dust. How can this be?”
Dr. Steven E. Jones another co-author of the paper writes:
“In short, the paper explodes the official story that “no evidence” exists for explosive/pyrotechnic materials in the WTC buildings.” The red/gray chips are the “loaded gun” of 9-11.
Download this important episode of Visibility 9-11 here.
Find links to the research paper, these episodes, and watch for other planned interviews on this topic at our Visibility 9-11 Special Report, The Thermite Fingerprint; The Loaded Gun.
Visibility 9-11 Welcomes back to the Program Dr. Steven E. Jones Play Now | Play in Popup | DownloadThe 9/11 Omission Hearings
September 17, 2007 By
Chaired by Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney
Full video playlist in 25 parts, use this link- http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=605E68182CFB244A
Commission Mission Statement
Commissioners’ Opening Words
Barry Zelman Reflects on Loss
Mindy Kleinberg Testimony
Jenna Orkin Environmental Crimes
John Judge 9-11 Omission Report
Orkin & Judge Questions and Answers
Nicholas Levis: Introductions and Promotions
Barrie Zwicker False Pretenses and Pretexts for War
Michael Springmann Visas to Terrorists
Paul Thompson Foreign Intelligence Warnings
Michael Ruppert Introduction
Michael Ruppert: Cheney Command and Control
Commisioners’ Review of Evidence / Testimony
Indira Singh Sibel’s Letter
Indira Singh and Ruppert Questions and Answers
Nicholas Levis Introduction Before Omission Dossier
Nicholas Levis 9-11 Omission Dossier
Carolyn Betts Unofficial Introduction and Background
Carolyn Betts: 9-11 Crimes Options for Re-dress Prosecution / Evidence – Taxonomy
John Judge Intelligence Agencies
Final Audience Questions and Answers
Program End
Visibility 9-11 Exposes Disinformation Associated with the Attack on The Pentagon
April 14, 2006 By
This broadcast takes a close look at the attack on the Pentagon, including a critical review of the film 9-11 In Plane Site.
Music by Truth Told. WARNING: EXPLICIT LANGUAGE
Direct Download this episode of Visibility 9-11 or listen in the embedded player below.
Visibility 9-11 Exposes Disinformation Associated with the Attack on The Pentagon Play Now | Play in Popup | DownloadSee Related Articles-
Journal of 9/11 Studies Letter: Disinformation and Misinformation
Information Warfare: Ideas as Weapons in the Era of Deception
The Pentagon Honey Pot
Visibility 9-11 Special Report on COINTELPRO
Is the 9/11 “Pentagon Hole” a Psyop to Distract from Real Questions?
Stunning Example of Dis-Information at Work – Knocking the Strawman Over
The CIT Virus
Obama staffer wants ‘cognitive infiltration’ of 9/11 conspiracy groups
To Con a Movement: Exposing CIT’s PentaCon ‘Magic Show’
David Chandler Talks About His New DVD “9/11 Analysis” and Rationalizes the Pentagon Debate on Visibility 9-11
Dr Frank Legge on Visibility 9-11: Mounting Evidence Shows Boeing 757-200 Impact with Pentagon Probable
9/11 Pentagon Attack – Small Hole Damage DEBUNKED
A dozen questions about Flight 77 and the Pentagon that might lead to justice, and one that won’t
Visibility 9-11 Discusses Evidence for Controlled Demolition at the WTC, part 2
February 8, 2006 By
This podcast is the second in a 3 part series which takes on the official story that impact from large jetliners, together with intense fires brought down the World Trade Center and WTC 7. Included, is a discussion of the phrase “outrageous conspiracy theories” and 11 features of controlled demolitions exhibited by the collapse of the twin towers and building 7.
Music by Mosdef. WARNING-CONTAINS EXPLICIT LYRICS
Direct Download this episode or listen in the embedded player below.
Visibility 9-11 Discusses Evidence for Controlled Demolition at the WTC, part 2 Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
