Two new papers at The Journal of 9/11 Studies
The first is “Obstacles to Persuasion: Lessons from the Classroom”, by Mark Vorobej.
Professor Vorobej teaches Philosophy, and is a former Director of the Centre for Peace Studies, at McMaster University. Here is the introductory paragraph from his paper.
“From January to April 2008, I taught an unusual upper-level undergraduate Philosophy course on Argumentation Theory at McMaster University. The course focused on such questions as “What makes a good argument good?” and “What makes a belief rational?” – where an argument is understood as an exercise in rational persuasion aimed at inculcating rational belief. And approximately five weeks of the course were devoted to studying the arguments of the 9/11 truth movement.”
The second paper is an updated version of a letter previously submitted by Michael Fury. It is called “The Ghost in the Machines: Evidence of Foreknowledge in the WTC Hard Drive Recoveries.” An excerpt is below.
“The locations of the computers in question within the towers is unknown, but if Wagner is correct, two possibilities emerge: (1) either the “insiders” had foreknowledge of the precise impact points of the aircraft (otherwise why assume that the main frames would be destroyed?) or (2) they had foreknowledge of the total destruction of the towers.”