More From the Blog

Newly Released Memo: Government ‘Minders’ at 9/11 Commission Interviews ‘Intimidated’ Witnesses – Kevin Fenton

9/11 Commission Memo entitled “Executive Branch Minders’ Intimidation of Witnesses,” complains that:

* Minders “answer[ed] questions directed at witnesses;”

* Minders acted as “monitors, reporting to their respective agencies on Commission staffs lines of inquiry and witnesses’ verbatim responses.” The staff thought this “conveys to witnesses that their superiors will review their statements and may engage in retribution;” and

* Minders “positioned themselves physically and have conducted themselves in a manner that we believe intimidates witnesses from giving full and candid responses to our questions.”

Trusted Websites I Recommend

9/11: Hard Evidence DavidChandler911 Published on Mar 13, 2014

.
9/11: Hard Evidence
DavidChandler911
Published on Mar 13, 2014
Three lines of evidence (the dynamics of the building destruction, evidence for high temperatures, and discovery of nanothermite in the WTC dust) + strong evidence of a coverup indicate that the official story of 9/11 is false. This is not conspiracy theory. This is hard evidence. Honesty requires that we be willing to follow the evidence.
David Chandler is on the board and on the science committee of Scientists for 9/11 Truth.

9/11: Hard Evidence

Share on These Popular Social Networking Websites

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

From the Podcast Archive