
Critique of CIT’s Fundamentally Flawed Methodology
by David Chandler – 911speakout.org I have often been asked why I reject the research of CIT (Citizen Investigation Team), which proposes that a large
by David Chandler – 911speakout.org I have often been asked why I reject the research of CIT (Citizen Investigation Team), which proposes that a large
by David Chandler – 911speakout.org Ken Jenkins and David Chandler recently took pairs of direct copies from the Pentagon surveillance video cameras and put them
The plane that hit the Pentagon can be seen using techniques to make it visible against the cluttered background. See http://911speakout.org/wp-content/upl… for more information.
University Park United Methodist Church (East Fellowship Hall) 2180 S University Blvd, Denver, CO 80210 May 4, 2019 / 9:30 am – 5:00 pm Tickets
Why We Expend Energy on Proving Large Plane Impact at the Pentagon Explanation of the Evidence at the Pentagon on 9/11 Created by Wayne Coste,
From the introductory material for this talk: With a clarity that both the layperson and the scientist can understand, David will answer these questions as
by David Chandler – April 11, 2018 What does it take for a tall building to collapse downward through its own structure at absolute free
There are fundamental grounds to reject the analysis put forward by CIT (Citizen Investigation Team), which proposes that a large plane approached the Pentagon from
Calling OUT Bravo-7: Firefighters’ Perspectives of High-Rise Fires and 9/11 (HD version) In honour of the 343, Firefighters talk about fire physics, building designs and
Two complementary videos are combined here in the order that they were presented at the 9/11 Truth Film Festival in Oakland, CA, on Sept
by David Chandler, 911speakout.org I did a presentation in Oakland on 9/10/2015 on the Pentagon evidence. At the time this web page was started the
Published on Mar 13, 2014 Three lines of evidence (the dynamics of the building destruction, evidence for high temperatures, and discovery of nanothermite in the
This is not the “Part II” I had originally envisioned. That will have to wait for Part III. In following up on the erroneous measurement
In its draft report, released in August 2008, NIST attempted to cover up evidence that WTC7 fell at freefall, but the coverup was transparent. In
Ten years have passed since the World Trade Center attacks of September 11, 2001, and there are still many unanswered questions surrounding that fateful day.
Show notes and interview by: John Bursill This timely and important Podcast is a MUST listen! David who describes himself as a “pacifist” talks in
This is a follow-up to the earlier video WTC7: NIST Admits Freefall, Part II. The previous video shows the actual process of determining the interval
Part III of this series fully explores the implications of NIST’s admission that WTC7 entered actual freefall and critiques the foundations of their “investigation.” In
This video tracks the motion of the NW corner of Building 7 of the World Trade Center on 9/11 2001. The building was in freefall
This podcast explores types of government in world history, The Constitution, and The Declaration of Independence. Featured is an historic re-enactment of Patrick Henry’s famous
This podcast takes a look at some of the 200+ Smoking Guns of 9-11 found in the Mainstream Media. NOTE: Announcement about David Ray Griffin’s
This podcast features an in studio visit by talk show host Trevor Carey of The Trevor Carey Show heard on 1310 am KFKA, www.1310kfka.com weeknights
In this special broadcast, Visibility 9-11 welcomes Ed Haas. Ed first broke the story that the FBI has said that there is “No hard evidence
This week Visibility 9-11 welcomes peace activist Dr. Dahlia Wasfi to discuss her connections to the war in Iraq, her activism against the war, and
On this, the second anniversary of the 9/11 Commission report, Visibility 9-11 welcomes professor emeritus at the Claremont School of Theology Dr. David Ray Griffin.
This podcast is a continuation from last week exploring the PowerPoint presentation by physics professor Steven E. Jones. Professor Jones asks the burning question “Why
This podcast is the second in a 3 part series which takes on the official story that impact from large jetliners, together with intense fires