WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part II)

WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part II)

This is not the “Part II” I had originally envisioned. That will have to wait for Part III.

In following up on the erroneous measurement described by John Gross in Part I, I decided to look more carefully at the measurement and find the video frame NIST claims marks the beginning of the collapse. What I found is that there is no motion of the roofline for at least 20-30 video frames after the point identified by John Gross. In other words, the measurement is a complete fabrication with the goal of producing a “measurement” to agree with the result predicted by NIST’s collapse model.

This result is sufficiently significant to merit its own video. …More to come soon in Part III.

(For more on John Gross, see… ) — – [The WTC7 series has elicited a number of questions from people unclear on the details of how I did the measurements, compared to how NIST did them and how the representatives of NIST described their measurements.

I have therefore created a WTC7 Measurement FAQ page:… . I will also use this FAQ as a place of reference for other questions that arise as well.]

Share on These Popular Social Networking Websites

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on reddit

From the Podcast Archive