Information Warfare: Ideas as Weapons in the Era of Deception

Information Warfare: Ideas as Weapons in the Era of Deception
by Hoffman, Ashley, and Jenkins
Original here.

At the core of the September 11, 2001 attack is a series of stupendous lies, including:

Adding to the absurdity of the official story are facts such as:

How could such glaring red flags be ignored by the vast majority of Americans, and indeed most people throughout the world? To grasp how this is possible it is helpful to understand the history and sophistication of the “weapons of mass deception” that are used regularly to achieve the aims that the powerful could not attain through legitimate means.

There are many examples of intentional deceptions that, unlike the Big Lie of 9/11/01, are widely recognized, such as the specter of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction concocted by the administrations of George W. Bush and Tony Blair as a pretext to invade Iraq. Other less contemporary examples are described on this site under Historical Precedents for 9/11/01. With each operation, the perpetrators gain more experience about how the news media and the public will react — experience useful in the planning of subsequent operations. For example, despite reports in local news outlets that responders to the Oklahoma City bombing discovered unexploded bombs inside the building, national media reports remained free of any mention of such contradictions to the official story. It is likely that the success of the cover-up of this operation emboldened the planners of the 9/11/01 attack.

The September 11, 2001 attack was not only bolder than previous attacks, it also likely involved the most careful planning of any psychological operation ever undertaken. We can see in its design and cover-up multiple layers of deception: should the outermost layer be exposed as fraudulent, the deeper layers will serve to continue to obscure the truth. Broadly speaking, there are three layers of cover-up:

  • The mainstream official story: This is the story as told by the mainstream media since the day of the attack.
  • The “limited hangouts”: These are revelations that seem shocking to adherents to the official story, but fall far short of the whole truth. Examples are the many warnings of the attack that the administration should have acted on.
  • The poison pills: These are extreme ideas that have no basis in evidence and serve to discredit evidence-based research about the core facts of the attack through guilt-by-association. Examples are the no-planes and pod-planes ideas popularized by propaganda such as In Plane Site, and racist ideas like “the Jews did it.”

Remarkably, it appears that the vast majority of propaganda supporting all three layers of deception was produced, not by attack insiders, but by people exploited by the perpetrators using psychological engineering. The perpetrators are apparently highly expert at designing memes that effectively recruit people to unwittingly support such diversions from the true nature of the attack.
Editors Note: This is the beginning page of an extensive study of dis-information and how it is being used to combat the lies of September 11th from being exposed. A multi-level propaganda campaign is underway and dis-information is a big part of the attempts to obscure the truth. Please take the time to explore this informational critique of the “poison pills” and how they are being used to discredit the work of many thousands of Americans across the country.

Share on These Popular Social Networking Websites


From the Podcast Archive

9-11; Historical Precedence

This week Michael covers the historical precedence of a 9-11 style,  false flag terror event in America.  Using the PowerPoint presentation he prepared for their

Read More »